State's Blake on U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue
U.S. Department of State
Remarks by Robert O. Blake, Jr.
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs
Washington Foreign Press Center
Washington, DC
June 14, 2012
Readout of the U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, thank you very much. I appreciate the
introduction and thank you all for coming. It's nice to see a lot of old friends
in the crowd today. I'll provide a readout, not just of the Strategic Dialogue,
but really the whole week because we've had a great many different dialogues
over the course of the last five days. So let me just briefly summarize some of
those.
One was the Science and Technology Joint Commission meeting that was
chaired by the President's Science Advisor, John Holdren, as well as India's
Science and Technology Minister Deshmukh. Second was, of course, the Higher
Education Dialogue chaired by Secretary Clinton and Minister of Human Resources
Development Kapil Sibal. The third were regional consultations that were held
earlier today between Foreign Secretary Mathai and Under Secretary of State for
Political Affairs Wendy Sherman, and then also our Global Issues Forum that is
probably still going on between, again, Foreign Secretary Mathai and Under
Secretary Otero.
And then last but not least was, of course, the Strategic Dialogue itself.
You all heard Secretary Clinton and External Affairs Minister Krishna describe
the progress that we are making. Secretary Clinton remarked that the strategic
fundamentals of our relationship are pushing our two countries into ever closer
strategic convergence, and she highlighted progress in five separate areas.
Since we're celebrating Global Economic Statecraft Day today, let me start with
the economic piece of it.
The Secretary remarked that bilateral trade between our two countries is up
40 percent since we began our Strategic Dialogue three years ago, and it is on
track to exceed what we hope will be a hundred billion dollars this year. In
addition, we want to advance our negotiations on the Bilateral Investment
Treaty, and of course, we want to continue to do everything we can to reduce
barriers to trade and investment in both directions.
The Secretary welcomed the Memorandum of Understanding that was signed
between Westinghouse and India's Nuclear Power Corporation, committing both
sides to work towards early works agreements on things like preliminary
licensing and site development that will be needed to begin construction work in
Gujarat. She also noted that General Electric is also making progress in its
talks with NPCIL. The Westinghouse MOU marks a very significant step towards the
fulfillment of our landmark civil-nuclear cooperation agreement. The Secretary
finally described in this area how we have mobilized more than $1 billion in
clean energy finance for projects of various kinds. You've all heard me describe
in the past how OPIC and Ex-Im and others have extremely large programs in India
as a result.
The second major area of cooperation and progress was in the area of
science and technology. The Secretary described how our joint commission is
working to improve our linkages in sciences, engineering, and data-sharing. And
she also welcomed the agreement concluded earlier this week to share the
U.S.-India Open Government Platform software that is promoting transparency and
accountability, and we're very pleased to welcome a third-country partner, our
first third-country partner, which will be Rwanda, and we hope to, of course,
welcome many, many more.
The third area of cooperation was in the area of education and
people-to-people ties. And again, the Secretary welcomed the progress that both
sides have been making in the Higher Education Dialogue to increase educational
exchanges and strengthen ties between our universities with a particular focus
on community colleges.
Fourth, on security and defense cooperation, Secretary Clinton highlighted
progress in the fight against violent extremism, our growing security
cooperation both on the military exercise front but also on our bilateral trade,
defense trade, which now exceeds $8 billion.
And finally, in our cooperation in South and East Asia, the United States
welcomed India's contribution towards building a stable, secure, and prosperous
Afghanistan, including its more than $2 billion in assistance that it is
providing. The Secretary thanked the Indians for hosting on June 28th a very
important investment conference that will take place in Delhi to galvanize more
international private sector investment for Afghanistan to look ahead to the
transition there. She announced our intention to have a U.S.-India-Afghanistan
trilateral dialogue. And the U.S. welcomes India's support for our participation
as a dialogue partner in the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional
Cooperation.
We have a lot more information on all of the things that we have talked
about and negotiated. You will have all seen the very lengthy joint statement
that we put out. And then I also just wanted to call your attention to four
different fact sheets that we put out in the areas of energy and climate change,
public health and research, science and technology, and security and regional
cooperation. So you'll find a wealth of really terrific information in all of
those as well.
So with that, I'd be happy to take some of your questions, including those
from our friends in New York who I understand are joining us as well.
MODERATOR: All right. As we move to the question-and-answer session, please
wait for the microphone, identify yourself by name and media organization, and
we'll start over here on the right, please.
QUESTION: Thank you. Chidu Rajghatta, the Times of India. Ambassador, about
the trilateral on Afghanistan involving Afghanistan, U.S., and India, how do you
expect to get around Pakistan? And at any point, was a quadrilateral considered?
And why not a quadrilateral?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, I think first of all, we want to start
with a trilateral. First off, we start with a bilateral, and so of course we
have very good bilateral dialogues with - well, each of us with Afghanistan.
We've each signed strategic partnership agreements. So there's a great deal to
talk about with respect to Afghanistan. This is certainly not in any way seen as
directed against Pakistan. On the contrary, it's to talk about the situation
inside Afghanistan, but also how we continue to support Afghanistan and the very
important three transitions that are going to be taking place - not only the
security transition, but the political transition, because Afghanistan will be
holding very important elections in 2014, and then the equally important
economic transition that you've heard me talk about a great deal.
So we haven't really yet talked about the details of this since we've just
agreed on this trilateral consultation, but we'll be doing so in the days and
weeks ahead.
MODERATOR: All right. Sir, we have a question from New York, so we'll go
ahead and turn the audio over to them. New York, go ahead.
QUESTION: Yes, good afternoon, Assistant Secretary. Thank you first for
giving the opportunity to ask a question. And basically, as it has become the
threat for not only Bangladesh, also for the regional peace and security, is
there any formula for a permanent - I mean, to - for the permanent solution of
the Rohingya issues in Myanmar and in Bangladesh borders?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Is there any permanent formula? Is that what you
said?
QUESTION: Yes. I mean any formulas to solve this problem permanently.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, I think we're focused right now
particularly on the Rohingya situation as it affects Burma. As you know, there's
been a lot of ethnic fighting between - inside Burma, and several have sought
refuge in Bangladesh. And we have urged our friends in Bangladesh to provide
humanitarian access and to honor their international obligations to do so. And
we hope they will because, again, I think many of these are fleeing potential
violence, many need medical assistance, and many others will need access to
shelter and food and water. So Bangladesh has a long history of accommodating
the Rohingyas, and we hope that they will continue to do so.
MODERATOR: We have a question here in the front.
QUESTION: Seema Sirohi, Firstpost.com and Gateway House.
Mr. Ambassador, I was wondering if this agreement signed between
Westinghouse and NBCIL, does it mean that your issues with the nuclear liability
law are resolved? Is there - has that been taken care of? And the other question
is --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sorry, let me answer that question first,
Seema.
QUESTION: Okay.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: No, it doesn't mean that the issues with respect
to liability law are resolved. But I think both of our countries wanted to show
that we still share a strong interest in seeing these commercial contracts come
to fruition. We do have, still, some concerns about the liability law. But the
signing of this MOU and the future conclusion of early works agreements will
provide very concrete evidence of our intention to move forward, and
particularly from our perspective, the interests of our companies in continuing
to work with NPCIL to develop the very promising opportunities in this - what
will be a $40 billion sector.
QUESTION: I have another question.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Please.
QUESTION: On India's desire to negotiate a totalization agreement with the
United States, the minister said that you don't even want to talk about it. So
what's going on? Why doesn't the U.S. want to talk about it and be fair on this
issue?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, this is a legal question for us as well.
There's a great imbalance in our systems right now, and so there are legal
restrictions on what kind of agreements we can enter into with partner
countries. But certainly, we have a dialogue with this and we understand the
importance of this issue to our Indian friends.
MODERATOR: We'll take our next question in the back on the left,
please.
QUESTION: Aziz Haniffa with India Abroad and Rediff.com. Piggybacking on
Chidu's question on Afghanistan, sometimes you come to regret what you wish for.
Earlier, there was a perception by - in India that India was being kept out of
the whole process because of pressure from Pakistan, et cetera. Now you guys
seem to be going overboard in terms of trilateral commissions and everything
else.
Is India going to be left with the baby in the bathwater in terms of
responsibilities - because the Taliban is still a major force there - in terms
of security also?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, I think, first of all, Aziz, I would take
issue with the premise of your question, which is we have not always welcomed
the important role that India has played in Afghanistan. I don't think you'll
ever - if you go back years and years, you'll not hear criticism from me or any
other spokesman talking about India's role in Afghanistan. And we continue to
welcome that across a broad range of what your country is doing, not only in
terms of the assistance program that I talked about, the investments that are
taking place in things like that Hajigak iron ore facility and deposit, but then
also the very important support that India is providing in terms of private
sector investment and, more broadly, the whole concept of regional integration.
So we very much welcome India's strong support for Afghanistan in all of these
areas, and as Secretary Panetta said during his trip, we also welcome India
doing more in terms of training, particularly the ANS
F and police training back to Indian facilities in India itself.
As we look ahead to the transition, we are very focused on showing to
Afghanistan that there will be strong international community support for all of
these transitions that I just mentioned. So you've heard me and many, many other
people talk about what we are calling the transition dividend, but also the
"transformation decade," as we say, of the next decade, 2014 to 2024, where we
hope very much that the international community will continue to be very engaged
not just in helping to support the ANSF, but also to provide the economic
assistance that Afghanistan will need to develop. And so I think this upcoming
conference that's going to take place in Tokyo on July 8th will be a very
important milestone in, again, looking forward to the economic piece of what I
just talked about.
QUESTION: But a quick follow-up --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: So we're certainly not leaving India to - in
Afghanistan. We're all going to be working very closely to help support
Afghanistan.
QUESTION: But as a quick follow-up, is there going to be a security
dimension too at this conference? Because the Taliban is still a major force.
There has no - been no vanquishing of them, you know?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Right.
QUESTION: And of course, elements of Haqqani and others have been
responsible for attacks on the Indian Embassy in Kabul, et cetera.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, there's not a direct security focus. It's
obviously - there's an economic focus. But the more success we have in
developing private sector investment to developing private sector jobs and
sustainable jobs for Afghans, of course, that will help to undermine the appeal
of the Taliban. So in that sense, there is a security aspect to it.
MODERATOR: We'll take another question here on the right.
QUESTION: Thank you. This is Lalit Jha from Press Trust of India. Welcome
here to the Foreign Press Center.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Only one question, Lalit. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: This is the fun part. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: Let's begin with the follow-ups. The two follow-ups I have -
(laughter) - on Afghanistan, at what level do you think this dialogue is going
to be? And have you spoken to Pakistan or informed Pakistan that this is what
you're going to do, the trilateral consultations between India, Afghanistan, and
the U.S.?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sorry, let me answer that because I won't
remember them. (Laughter.)
We haven't yet. As I say, we're just beginning to think about this and talk
to both India and Afghanistan about how we're going to structure this dialogue.
So we haven't made a decision yet about things like the level. But yes, we did
have some contacts with the Government of Pakistan.
QUESTION: On Rohingya, Bangladesh, you know as a poor country it doesn't
have much resources. Is the U.S. willing to help or provide some kind of
financial assistance to Bangladesh to take care of the refugees that are coming
across the border from Burma?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Certainly. And normally, the way this works,
Lalit, is that UNHCR, the UN High Commission for Refugees, has - is supporting
assistance efforts there. They have their own camps, but also they work with
NGOs. So we typically respond to an appeal from the UNHCR. So if the UNHCR
determines that it needs more resources to help Bangladesh to accommodate these
refugees, then I'm sure that we will be more than happy to accommodate that
request, because the United States, as you know, is always one of the most
generous and early supporters of these kinds of appeals.
So again, Bangladesh will not be facing this problem alone. We understand
that these kind of things impose a burden on countries and a cost on countries,
so again, we hope very much that they will open their borders and allow people
in and that UNHCR and others will be permitted to work very closely with the
Bangladeshi authorities to accommodate those new refugees.
QUESTION: And my question: Was China factor discussed during the Strategic
Dialogue? Because in the last couple of years, I have seen all the joint
statements, but U.S.-China Dialogue didn't mention to South Asia. And India-U.S.
Dialogue, there is some mention to China. In this joint - 14-page joint
statement, there's no reference to China at all. Even the briefing, there has
been no reference to China. So was this discussed or have you kept out of
it?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, China was discussed. I don't want to say
China was a focus. I mean, we were much more focused on things like Afghanistan
and so forth. But as you've heard me say before, both India and the United
States want a good, strong engagement with China, and we don't see our strategic
partnership as coming in any way at the expense of China. And so, again, I think
it was more in that context. And we will continue to look for opportunities to
engage bilaterally with China, but also, as you know, we have offered a
trilateral dialogue with China as well that we hope that they will agree
to.
MODERATOR: All right. We have a few questions on the left. We'll start in
the back.
QUESTION: Thank you. Kitty Wang (ph) with NTD TV. Regarding deepening the
defense cooperation with India, did you heard any concern from the Indian part
in the dialogue such as increased U.S. military presence there or deployment
there?
And also, could you talk a more about your cooperation with India on the
cyber security aspect?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: We didn't hear any complaints, if that's what
you're asking about, any kind of military presence. Whenever we have a military
presence, it's only at the invitation of the Government of India. And for -
typically for our bilateral exercises - as you know, we have the largest program
that India has with any country of bilateral military exercises. We certainly
welcome those opportunities.
So we talked a little bit about that, but we also talked about how we both
want to continue to try to work to expand our defense trade, particularly to
take it into new areas like co-production and co-development.
MODERATOR: All right. We'll take another -
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sorry. You have one more question? Go
ahead.
QUESTION: Yeah. Regarding the cyber security, how will you defend --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Oh, yes. I mean, we had a good discussion on
cyber security. To be honest, I don't want to get too much into the details of
what we talked about for understandable reasons, but, again, I think we see this
as a very important new area of cooperation, not just because of our very large
IT sectors that each of us have and the growing cooperation in that area in
terms of the service industry, but also in terms of the threats that each of us
face as well. And so we - again, we have common interest in sharing best
practices and again, addressing those. But again, for obvious reasons, we don't
want to go too much into the details of that.
MODERATOR: All right. We'll stay here on the left.
QUESTION: Thank you. Raghubir Goyal, India Globe and Asia Today. Mr.
Secretary, two questions: One, is how much Pakistan was discussed, because
Minister spoke about this yesterday at the media conference with the Indian
media? He was not very happy the response he got from the U.S. as far as - many
terrorists are wanted by India from Pakistan who were involved in Mumbai
attacks, and also he spoke about Headley, among others. So response is not very
good from Pakistan, and Pakistan is still helping those, Haqqani Network and all
that are against India.
And second, my question will be: As far as U.S.-India Business Council and
-
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sorry. Let me answer the first one - question.
Well, I didn't see the Minister's comments, but let me just say that we had a
good conversation. We obviously share India's concerns about some of the threats
that are emanating from Pakistan, from groups like Lashkar-e Tayyiba. And we're
working very hard to - both to encourage Pakistan to take action against those,
but also to prevent those kinds of attacks from occurring through our
intelligence and other kinds of cooperation.
With respect to your question about David Headley and things like that,
that's really the province of the Department of Justice, and so I'd refer you to
them. But as a whole, I would just tell you that there's been very good
information exchange between our two countries on - with respect to Mr. Headley
and others. And we are very firmly committed to continuing that information
exchange and certainly to sharing any kind of threat information the instant
that we get it, because that is - that, of course, is extremely important to the
security of India, but also to - an important part of our counterterrorism
cooperation.
QUESTION: And second question will be on economy and trade. Since two
countries, India and U.S., are the world's largest and richest democracy, both
are moving towards (inaudible) trade, economic, and other issues. But visa is a
major issue among those U.S.-India Business Council and 500 Fortune companies
doing business or who wants to do business in India and also vice versa,
companies from India. One, are you moving forward as far as free trade agreement
with India, just like you have with South Korea and other countries? Because
since when you are saying that India is the most moving forward partnership now
in the future? And finally visa, how far these companies they are seeking and
asking more visas and but you are cutting visas rather than giving them more
visas to do business in India - to do business in the U.S. Thank you, sir.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Okay. There are a lot of different questions in
that question. So let me try to unpack those a little a bit. (Laughter.) First
of all, with respect to visas, you're - I think you're referring primarily to
H1-B visas and, as you well know, India now receives 65 percent of the worldwide
total of H1-B visas. So I think that's a pretty commendable number and
percentage and in terms of the L-1 visas - the so-called intra-company transfer
visas - India receives 37 percent of those -- again, 37 of the worldwide total.
Congress is the one that determines the caps for H1-B visas, not the United
States Government. So - and that cap has remained fairly steady for quite a long
time now.
So, again, I think we're doing everything we can within our own, within the
law to give Indian companies fair access to the H1-B system, and I think that
they have shown themselves more than capable of taking advantage of all the
opportunities, and we continue to welcome those kinds of workers. And the real
quibble, if I might say, has been more on the L-1 - the intra-company
transferees where the number of - the rate of rejections has gone up slightly.
And we have a refusal rate that's gone up a little bit because we've seen a
higher level of unqualified applicants and in some cases some fraud. So
naturally, we want to make sure that everybody that comes in is a qualified
applicant and is coming for the purposes that are stated in the visa
application.
So we're looking at why that refusal rate seems to have gone up a little
bit more but - in response to the concerns that have been raised. But again, I'm
a strong supporter of all of our consular officers and think they do a superb
job.
MODERATOR: All right. I think --
QUESTION: (Inaudible.)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Oh sorry, FTA. I told you, you can't ask me more
than question at once, I can't remember.
We're not currently now working on a Free Trade Agreement with India. As I
said earlier, our efforts are focused first on trying to conclude a Bilateral
Investment Treaty. We have had a model Bilateral Investment Treaty approved
earlier this year, so that then gave us the opportunity to again re-launch
negotiations on the bit with India, and we've had some good early rounds of
discussions and, again, we hope to advance those as rapidly as possible.
MODERATOR: Sir, I know your time is running short. Do we have time for one
more question?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sure, sure - or a couple more.
QUESTION: I just wanted to come back to the $1 billion question and the
visas.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sure.
QUESTION: What is the legal justification you mentioned for extracting a
billion dollars annually from people who are ostensibly guest workers in terms
of social security payments? And what is the moral justification for not
returning the money? You say that there is an ongoing dialogue, but the minister
actually distinctly said that the U.S. refuses to even talk about this. And this
is $1 billion annually from a country that's not very --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, again, I don't want to make it sound like
we are discriminating against Indians. I mean, these are taxes that are taken
out of every single worker in the United States, and that's - when you come to
the United States, that's one of the things that you agree to do, is that
--
QUESTION: (Inaudible.)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Well, any worker. That's just part of our system
to make sure that taxes and social security and other - are automatically
deducted from your paycheck. And so I don't want to - your question implies that
we're somehow discriminating against Indians. Everybody is subject is to this
--
QUESTION: Because - there are totalization agreements with countries like
Belgium where the money's returned. So why not with India?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Right. But that's - see, again, there's an
imbalance in our system between - in between what -- your system is configured
completely differently from our own. If you want, I could have a chat with you
offline, because it's - it gets into very technical, complicated details. But
essentially, for the moment, we're not in a position to be able to enter into a
totalization agreement with India, and we've explained the reasons why we can't
do that. But we understand very well their concerns.
MODERATOR: So maybe one final question.
QUESTION: I have two questions. On the sidelines of the SCO meeting, the
Chinese vice premier apparently pulled aside Minister Krishna and whispered in
his ear that the "real relationship," quote/unquote, is between China and India.
And this was with an eye to sort of criticizing the growing U.S.-India
relationship. So I was wondering if you'd like to comment on that.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: I don't have anything to say beyond what I've
already said on that. So what else?
QUESTION: Okay. The second question is on Iran oil sanctions.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Sure.
QUESTION: Are we done with this, or is this going to be a recurring demand
that we - India keep cutting oil imports, because this is causing unnecessary
friction?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: No, no. We're certainly not done. And again,
this is something that we're asking of all of our partners around the world.
This is not something that's focused on India. But the current exceptions that
have been granted apply for a period of 180 days - so for a period of six
months.
So we're asking all of our friends and all countries around the world to
continue to reduce their imports of oil from Iran and to discontinue
transactions with the Central Bank of Iran and that there needs to be continued
progress on that. So we hope we'll see that. And again, I think that as many
others have said, these sanctions have had a real impact, and they've helped to
bring Iran to the negotiating table. And so - and have again helped to
dramatically reduce Iranian oil exports from I think a high of 2.5 million
barrels to down to a range of 1.2 to 1.8 million barrels a day. So that's quite
significant and it's, again, it's just important to keep the pressure on Iran so
that they will come and negotiate with in good faith with the P-5+1 and with -
and to continue, again, to work very closely with the IAEA and allow the IAEA
access to all relevant facilities inside Iran.
MODERATOR: Sir, thank you very much for coming to the Foreign Press Center.
This event is now concluded. Thank you all for coming.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY BLAKE: Thank you all. It was great to see you all.
Thanks a lot.
(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State.)
No comments:
Post a Comment