Ban on India Inc acquiring SC, ST land
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today said
that the land belonging to scheduled castes (SCs) or tribes (STs) cannot be
bought by non-dalits, including companies as such transactions are
unconstitutional.
A bench of justices K S Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra
gave the verdict on an appeal by the Rajasthan government against the state high
court’s order holding such a sale to be valid in law.
The high court had passed its order on an appeal by a
firm, Aanjaney Organic Herbal Pvt Ltd, against the refusal by the state
authorities to recognise or grant mutation to the purchase of a plot by the
company from a person belonging to scheduled caste.
“The Act is a beneficial legislation which takes
special care to protect the interest of the members of Schedule Caste and
Schedule Tribe.
“Section 42 (SC, ST Act) provides some general
restrictions on sale, gift and bequest of the interest of Scheduled Caste and
Scheduled Tribe, in the whole or part of their holding.
“The reason for such general restrictions is not only
to safeguard the interest of the members of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe,
but also to see that they are not being exploited by the members of
non-Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe.
“We find Section 42(b) of the Act has to be read along
with the constitutional provisions and, if so read, the expression `who is not a
member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe would mean a person other than
those who has been included in the public notification as per Articles 341 and
342 of the Constitution,” said Justice Radhakrishnan, writing the judgement for
the bench.
That property was purchased on September 26, 2005
through a registered sale deed for a consideration of Rs
60,000.
The high court had held that such a transfer was valid
as the company being a `juristic person’ does not have a caste and, therefore,
any transfer made by a Scheduled Caste person would not be hit by Section 42(b)
of the Act.
“If the contention of the company is accepted, it can
purchase land from Scheduled Caste / Scheduled Tribe and then sell it to a
non-Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe, a situation the legislature wanted to
avoid.
“A thing which cannot be done directly can not be done
indirectly by over-reaching the statutory restriction.
“We are, therefore, of the view that the reasoning of
the high court that the respondent being a juristic person, the sale effected by
a member of Scheduled Caste to a juristic person, which does not have a caste,
is not hit by Section 42 of the Act, is untenable and gives a wrong
interpretation to the above mentioned provision,” the apex court
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment