Lighting up the plant
hormone “command system”
Stanford, CA
—Light is not only the source of a
plant’s energy, but also an environmental signal that instructs the growth
behavior of plants. As a result, a plant’s sensitivity to light is of great
interest to scientists and their research on this issue could help improve crop
yields down the road. Similarly understanding a plant’s temperature sensitivity
could also help improve agriculture and feed more people. Two new papers from
Carnegie’s Zhiyong Wang laboratory identify key aspects of the hormonal
responses of plants to changes in light and heat in their environments. Their
work is published online July 22 by Nature Cell Biology.
To have optimal exposure to sun
light, plants must grow differently depending on the lighting conditions. For
example, when a seed germinates underground, it must elongate its stem rapidly
to reach the surface of soil; when a plant is shaded by its neighbor, it also
elongate its stem to outcompete for sun light; whereas expanding leaves is the
priority for plants under full sun light. On the other hand, like all organisms,
plant growth and development is also regulated by internally produced chemical
signals, namely hormones. How plants coordinate their responses to light and
hormonal signals is an outstanding question of great interest to scientists and
importance to crop yield. It is believed that identification of the central
regulatory mechanism that integrates multiple environmental and hormonal signals
has great potential for improving crop yield. Such a central regulatory
mechanism is the focus of the two papers from the Wang
lab.
The light-induced transition
from a developmental pathway that leads to slim seedling with yellow folded
leaves, called etiolation, to a developmental pathway that leads to short stem
and expanded green leaves, called de-etoilation, has been extensively studied
for many years. This research led to the discovery, 15 years ago, of the steroid
hormone brassinosteroid, which is found throughout the plant kingdom and
regulates many aspects of growth and development.
Mutant plants that are
deficient in brassinosteroid that are grown in the dark, show features of plants
grown in the light. They also have defects at many phases of the plant life
cycle, including reduced seed germination, dwarfism, and sterility.
The physiological effects of
brassinosteroids are very similar to those of gibberellin, another hormone. But
the relationship between these two hormones has been unclear at the molecular
level. Recent studies of Wang and his colleagues have elucidated the molecular
pathway through which brassinosteroid alters gene expression and explored the
relationship of the two hormones.
In the two Nature Cell
Biology papers, Wang and his team identified key junctions between the
molecular pathway that transduces the brassinosteroid signal and those for the
light, temperature, and gibberellin signals. The studies explain how multiple
environmental and hormonal signals regulate plant growth and development. The
studies also elucidate a biochemical “command system” that integrates a wide
range of signals into growth regulation.
In contrast to the widely held
concept that environmental signals affect endogenous hormones to alter plant
growth, the study by Wang found surprisingly that light does not affect
brassinosteroid. Instead, brassinosteroid has major effects on the sensitivity
of plants to light by not only altering the levels of proteins mediating light
responses, but also providing an essential partner for a transcription factor,
named PIF4, that is directly inactivated by the photoreceptor phytochrome. The
brassinosteroid-activated BZR1 protein and dark-stabilized PIF4 protein form a
complex that drives expression of genes required for the etiolation process.
By contrast, light removal of
PIF4, or the absence of BZR1 caused by brassinosteroid deficiency, leads to
de-etiolation and inhibition of cell elongation. The study also shows that the
growth response to high temperature, known to be mediated by PIF4, also requires
BZR1-PIF4 complex formation. The study therefore revealed a new function of
brassinosteroid in gating the responses to light and temperature, likely
according to the internal physiological conditions.
Brassinosteroid and gibberellin
are two major growth-promoting hormones that induce similar growth responses in
higher plants. Wang and his team demonstrate that the effects of gibberellin on
cell elongation depend on the presence of brassinosteroid and active BZR1
protein in the nucleus. This is because gibberellin removes a class of
inhibitory proteins, named DELLAs, which inactivate BZR1, and thereby allow BZR1
to regulate gene expression more effectively. Without brassinosteroid and BZR1,
gibberellin has little effect on cell growth.
The research indicates that
brassinosteroid provides an essential factor required for cell elongation
growth, whereas gibberellin provides another layer of quantitative control of
the activity of this factor. Because gibberellin is known to be affected by
environmental conditions, such as light and stresses, and brassinosteroid level
varies greatly in different organs, the interactions among PIF4, DELLAs and BZR1
appear to form the “command system” that effectively integrates information of
environmental condition, endogenous situation, and developmental program into
the “decision” about growth.
Taken together, this research
demonstrates that the interdependent relationships between brassinosteroid,
elements of the gibberellin pathway, and phytochrome-interacting factors form a
“command system” of sorts, which controls key growth processes and responses to
environmental signals.
“This command system seems not
only to accept various inputs, but also to send branches of output signals, too,
because each component acts interdependently on shared targets, but also
independently on unique sets of target genes,” Wang said. “This complex network
contains multiple layers and controls major plant growth and developmental
processes. We believe this network will be a major target for engineering
high-yielding crops.”
Wang’s co-authors on one paper
are Carnegie’s Eunkyoo Oh and Jia-Ying Zhu. His co-authors on the other paper
are Carnegie’s Ming-Yi Bai, Jian-Xiu Shang (also of Hebei Normal University),
Eunkyoo Oh, Min Fan, and Yang Bai, as well as Rodolfo Zentella and Tia-ping Sun
of Duke University
__________________
Research for the two papers was supported in part by NIH,
NSF, and the China Scholarship Council.
The Carnegie Institution for Science (carnegiescience.edu) is a private,
nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., with six research
departments throughout the U.S. Since its founding in 1902, the Carnegie
Institution has been a pioneering force in basic scientific research. Carnegie
scientists are leaders in plant biology, developmental biology, astronomy,
materials science, global ecology, and Earth and planetary
science.
No comments:
Post a Comment